2022-26 ELECTRICITY BASE TARIFF APPLICATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In line with the 2017 Tariff
Methodology, once every four years, power sector licensees prepare and submit
their business plans to the Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority (MERA) for
consideration and approval. The Licensee business plans contain revenue requirements
for a four -year period to finance both operational and capital requirements. The
business plans under consideration cover the period from 2022 to 2026 (Fourth
Base Tariff Application). This document has been prepared jointly by Power Market
Limited (PML) as Single Buyer and Electricity Supply Corporation of Malawi
(ESCOM) Limited which holds Transmission, System and Market Operator (SMO) and
Distribution Licensees.
2.0 CONTEXT FOR 2022-26 BUSINESS PLANS
2.1 Power Sector Reforms
The Business Plans have been prepared in the context of Power Sector Reforms being implemented by the Government of Malawi following the enactment of the Electricity Amendment Act in 2016. The main objective of the reforms is to provide a conducive environment for private sector participation in the electricity sector, especially in generation. The reforms culminated into unbundling of generation from ESCOM and the subsequent formation of the Electricity Generation Company (EGENCO) which took over generation assets formally owned by ESCOM. The other key component of the reforms is the establishment of single buyer, transmission, SMO and distribution licensees to perform various activities in the electricity supply chain. Subsequently, Government in 2020 operationalized Power Market Limited to hold the Single Buyer License. As a result of these reforms, the country is now able to procure generation from independent power producers (IPPs) to supplement Government efforts in increasing power supply in the country. Our business plans have been developed to comply with reforms frameworks as provided for in the 2016 Electricity Amendment Act, Licensing conditions and regulatory frameworks.
2.2 Load shedding and Network Reliability
The country is currently experiencing long hours of loadshedding due to inadequate power supply situation. Customers experience up to 10 hours of loadshedding on a regular basis. This situation has a negative impact of the socio-economic development of the country.
The network is also experiencing high volumes of faults and long clearance times. This is as a result of lack of investment in transmission and distribution network asset maintenance, rehabilitation, and expansion.
Customers have expressed their frustration with lack of network reliability evidenced by long hours of load shedding and high network faults as described above. They are frustrated that the power supply situation in the country is not improving despite the electricity bills that they pay.
Considering the above, we have built our business plans to have adequate power supply sources into the country and to increase network reliability.
2.3 Risk and Uncertainty
Determination of revenue requirements for a four-year period carries with it inherent risks and uncertainties due to assumptions used. These risks may arise as result of assumptions made on inflation, exchange rates, sales and revenues, regulatory asset base (RAB), taxes, planned generation capacity etc. These risks will be managed through various instruments such as annual tariff reviews, decoupling mechanism and Automatic Tariff Adjustment Formula (ATAF).
2.4 Sector Performance in 2018-22 Base Tariff Period.
2.4.1 Technical Performance
At the commencement of the 2018-2022 Base Tariff period, the country had a total installed capacity of 426.93MW. A total of 110.36MW of generation was added to the national grid between 2018 and 2022, representing a 24% increase in installed capacity. Out of the110.36MW, 80MW is solar generation installed by JCM, while the rest is hydro generation installed by Electricity Generation Company (EGENCO) Limited (19.1), Mulanje Hydro Limited (8.2 MW) and Cedar Energy (3.06 MW). Within the same period, about 80MW of Aggreko diesel generation was leased to minimize the impact of load shedding. The Aggreko contract has now expired, and they are currently decommissioning.
Despite the above additions, the sector continued to experience inadequate power supplies especially towards the end of the tariff period due to the unavailability of 130MW from Kapichira Power Station because of the damage caused by Cyclone Ana. This was a setback in the sector as Kapichira Power Station provides one-third of installed capacity.
Persistently throughout the period of base tariff, energy sales were below target due to a number of reasons, which include:
- generation challenges because of the drought experienced in the country between 2017 and 2019.
- Non-implementation of the phased tariff as approved by the regulator at the beginning of the base tariff period. Some of the planned tariff adjustments were either delayed, reduced or not implemented at all.
- Non-implementation of automatic tariff adjustment mechanism (ATAF) as provided for in the tariff methodology. Between March 2021 and March 2022, tariffs were supposed to be upward adjusted by 13.3% due to ATAF application alone. The ATAF adjustment is even higher considering the recent devaluation of the local currency and associated inflationary pressure.
- Lack of adequate framework for conducting annual tariff reviews and reconciliations which has resulted in some of the adjustment mechanisms not taking place.
- High technical and commercial losses of 22.2% at the end of the tariff period against a target of 16%.
- Non implementation of planned investments in generation capacity, particularly by independent power producers.
As a result of the revenue deficit in the 2018-22 base tariff period, ESCOM underperformed in some of the key performance indicators. These include among others, new connections, adherence to customer service charter commitments and implementation of some planned investments/projects. This is because ESCOM prioritized paying generators and IPPs while its operations suffered.
2.4.2 Financial Performance
The sector has reported a total
revenue deficit of MK112.5 billion in the period of July 2018 to March
2022. The total achieved revenues for the IPPs, SMO, Distribution, and Bad
Debts, were less by MK53.8 billion, MK13.2 billion, MK43.6 billion and MK5.7
billion respectively as compared to the actual costs reported within the
same period. The total revenue deficit is explained in table 1 below:-
Table 1: Analysis of Allowed Revenues and Costs [July 2018 to March 2022]
IPP Cost | SBL | SMOL | TL | DL | Bad Debts | Levies | Total | ||
Allowed Revenues | MK’000 | 286,797,822 | 13,855,164 | 5,244,019 | 67,123,104 | 182,464,359 | 18,263,543 | 33,211,074 | 606,959,085 |
Impact of Delayed Tariff Adjustment | MK’000 | (11,653,600) | (11,653,600) | ||||||
Excess Losses | MK’000 | (11,278,033) | (14,776,944) | (26,054,977) | |||||
Revenue Achieved | MK’000 | 286,797,822 | 13,855,164 | 5,244,019 | 55,845,071 | 156,033,815 | 18,263,543 | 33,211,074 | 569,250,508 |
IPP Invoices | MK’000 | 340,608,196 | 340,608,196 | ||||||
SB Cost | MK’000 | 11,589,050 | 11,589,050 | ||||||
SMO Cost | MK’000 | 18,395,467 | 18,395,467 | ||||||
TL Cost | MK’000 | 55,510,122 | 55,510,122 | ||||||
DL | MK’000 | 199,606,250 | 199,606,250 | ||||||
Bad Debts | MK’000 | 24,049,489 | 24,049,489 | ||||||
Levies | MK’000 | 31,958,418 | 31,958,418 | ||||||
Total Costs | MK’000 | 340,608,196 | 11,589,050 | 18,395,467 | 55,510,122 | 199,606,250 | 24,049,489 | 31,958,418 | 681,716,992 |
Total Deficit / Surplus | MK’000 | (53,810,374) | 2,266,114 | (13,151,448) | 334,949 | (43,572,435) | (5,785,946) | 1,252,656 | (112,466,484) |
In the 2018-22 base tariff period, the Regulator has been failing to timely grant a tariff increase in line with the approved plan. These delays resulted into ESCOM reporting a tariff revenue deficit of MK11.7 billion. The total deficit on delayed tariff adjustment is a direct cost to the Distribution Licensee.
On the other hand, ESCOM reported more energy losses than what were allowed by the Regulator in the approved plan. Analysis of the impact of these excess losses presented in the table above indicates that during the period under review ESCOM lost a total MK26.1 billion due to excess energy losses.
The
analysis further shows that out of these losses, Transmission Licensee contributed
a total amount of MK11.3 billion while MK14.8 billion was contributed
by Distribution Licensee.
3.0 OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES OF THE 2022-26 BASE TARIFF.
3.1 Focus on customers and stakeholders
In building the 2022-26 business plan, we have listened carefully to the voice of our customers and stakeholders. We have consulted with various stakeholders such as Ministry of Energy, the Energy Regulator (MERA), Malawi Confederation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (MCCCI), Economists Association of Malawi (ECAMA), Society of Accountants in Malawi (SOCAM), Consumers Association of Malawi (CAMA), Miners Association, Industrial customers (Illovo, Blantyre Water Board), Hardtalk Energy, Sunbird Hotels etc. We also constantly gather feedback from customers through ESCOM’s customer service outlets as well as from social media platforms. The common themes from the feedback received from our customers and stakeholders which have formed the basis of the priorities and objectives of the 2022-26 revenue requirement determination and submission. These priorities and objectives are described below.
3.1.1 Provision of Continuous and Uninterrupted Electricity Supply.
Customers and stakeholders have clearly emphasized the need for continuous availability of electricity. We have responded to this key area of feedback by providing for procurement of adequate power supply sources, and investment in network infrastructure maintenance, rehabilitation, and upgrades.
It is difficult currently to determine true peak demand due to the load shedding being undertaken in the country. Peak demand has been suppressed for a number of years. Two studies have attempted to determine peak demand through modelling in the past few years. The 2017 Integrated Resource Plan estimated peak demand forecast shown in Table 2, whereas the latest demand forecast has been developed in the Cost of Supply Study (2022), presented in Table 3.
Table 2: IRP Peak Demand Forecast
Year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
Demand (MW) | 618 | 542 | 596 | 654 |
Table 3: COSS Peak Demand Forecast
Demand Scenario (MW) | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
High | 449 | 527 | 573 | 627 |
Medium | 431 | 503 | 544 | 592 |
Low | 418 | 485 | 521 | 564 |
Table 4 below shows all the generation and power supply sources that have been contracted to commence operations between now and 2026, while Table 4 shows potential total power supply capacity (including existing) if all the contracted capacity were to be realized in those particular years.
Table 4: Planned New Power Supply Sources Between 2022 and 2026
Company | Power Supply Type | Contracted Capacity (MW) | Commercial Operations Date r |
Serengeti | Solar | 21 | 2022 |
Mozambique-Malawi Interconnector | Interconnector | 50 | 2023 |
EGENCO | CCGT | 50 | 2023 |
EGENCO | Solar | 20 | 2023 |
Voltalia | Solar | 40 | 2023 |
Atlas | Solar | 20 | 2023 |
Greencells | Solar | 34 | 2023 |
AZA | Gas | 75 | 2023 |
Gebis Waste Energy | Gas | 10 | 2024 |
Quantel | Solar | 50 | 2025 |
Droege | Wind | 50 | 2025 |
YM Power | Wind | 109.5 | 2025 |
EGENCO Peaking Diesel | Diesel | 30 | 2025 |
Rukuru Power | Coal | 100 | 2026 |
Table 5: Existing and Planned Power Supply Between 2022 and 2026
Year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
Total Potential Power Supply Capacity (MW) | 555 | 844 | 854 | 954 |
Table 5 indicates that the country would have adequate power supply sources to meet the IRP peak demand forecast, being the worst-case demand forecast scenario (assuming all planned projects are implemented as per their planned commercial operations dates). However, to avoid exposing customers to project development uncertainties, the revenue requirements have only included projects which meet a criterion which has been agreed jointly by PML and ESCOM. Using this criterion, only power purchase costs associated with Malawi-Mozambique interconnection and Serengeti Solar Plant have been included in the base revenue requirements. Power purchase costs for other plants (Table 4) becoming operational within the tariff period will be treated via the tariff adjustment mechanisms. Table 6 below shows the total capacity of power supply sources whose power purchase costs have been included in the base revenue requirements.
Table 6: Power Supply Capacity in 2022-2026 Base Tariff Period
Year | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
Power Supply Capacity (MW) | 555 | 605 | 605 | 605 |
Network reliability is another important aspect to ensure provision of uninterrupted power supply. A total of MK 81.1 billion (MK18.4 billion transmission, MK62.7billion distribution) has been included in the revenue requirement for network maintenance, MK186.6 billion (MK7.2billion transmission, MK179.4billion distribution) for network rehabilitation, MK149.24 billion (MK106.1billion transmission, MK43.2billion distribution) for network reinforcements/upgrade and MK446.2 billion (MK239.6billion transmission, MK206.6billion distribution) for network expansion. Total cost of network reliability is MK863.2 billion (MK371.3billion transmission, MK492 for distribution).
3.1.2 Affordability.
Customers have informed us of the need to have continuous and uninterrupted power supply which is affordable. For this reason, we have deviated from some of the provisions in the Tariff Methodology, as advised by the Regulator (MERA), for the Tariff to be affordable to customers. For example, our asset revaluation has been based on historical costs valuation method to determine regulatory asset base (RAB) used to calculate depreciation and a fair rate of return. This deviation from the Tariff Methodology has led to customer savings of MK182.3 billion from ESCOM.
In terms of customer connections, the main concern received from customers was the need for flexibility in dealing with different types of customers. For example, the current average cost to connect residential customers is approximately MK520 thousand. Feedback from some customers is that they cannot afford to pay the whole connection cost, while others value a fast connection service and have said there should be flexibility to allow them to buy own materials. Customers currently pay a capital contribution of MK65 thousand towards the average cost of a connection, which means the rest (MK455, thousand) is borne by ESCOM to make the connection affordable. Total cost of ESCOM’s contribution for the four-year period is MK 248 billion. We are aware that some customers can pay more towards the cost of a connection in order to facilitate a speedy connection. For this reason, ESCOM is currently reviewing capital contribution charges which will be incorporated in the tariff next year through an annual tariff review. An increase in capital contribution from customers will result in a decrease of the contribution from ESCOM, which will ease financing pressure from ESCOM and accelerate customer connections.
It is also recognized that some of ESCOM’s potential customers cannot afford making any contribution towards the cost of a connection. These potential customers should also not be left behind in order to meet Government’s objective of increasing electricity access. In this regard, ESCOM has made a provision in its revenue requirements to make 40,000 free connections in the tariff period at a total cost of MK 20.8 billion.
3.1.3 Improved Customer Service
ESCOM will undertake a number of initiatives aimed at improving customer service offering. These include operationalization of a customer contact centre, improving corporate image through rehabilitation of offices and facilities, digitization of key customer service processes such as new connection application process and provision of adequate resources commensurate with growth in customer base and the network through implementation of a zoning system. ESCOM will also develop and implement a customer satisfaction survey, a tool for obtaining customer feedback. Total cost for implementing these customer service improvement initiatives is MK10.2 billion over the period.
3.1.4 Sustainability of the Energy Sector.
Stakeholders understand the need for adequate revenues, through provision of cost reflective tariffs to different sector players to ensure sustainability of the sector. There is need to balance revenue requirements of all players and to avoid advantaging one player at the expense of others. All sector players should be treated with fairness.
In addition, there is also a need to stabilize the tariff over the tariff period through the establishment of a sector wide price stabilization fund. This Fund should not just cater for generators and IPPs but all sector Licensees. For this reason, it is being proposed that the scope of the Stabilization Fund be expanded to cater for all Licensees and not just generation licensees. A Stabilization Fund of MK141.43 billion has been included in the revenue requirement for single buyer licensee to cushion licensees and customers from sector wide risks and frequent tariff shocks. The stabilization Fund shall work jointly with the ATAF, similar to the Fuel Stabilization Fund.
3.1.5 Accelerating access to electricity.
Government of Malawi has targeted 30% of the population to have access to grid electricity by 2030. This would require making 1,680,000 new connections by 2030, which would have huge implications on customer bills. In order to balance with the affordability objective, ESCOM has planned to connect a total of 600,000 customers over the tariff period (150,000 per year). These include:
- 240,000 from the World Bank funded Malawi Electricity Access Project (MEAP).
- 60,000 from Malawi Rural Electrification Project (MAREP).
- 300,000 funded by ESCOM through tariff. This includes 40,000 free connections.
ESCOM failed to meet connection targets in the 2018-22 tariff period mainly due to financing arrangements. The requirement that ESCOM should borrow money from banks to connect customers and to claim later from MERA proved a failure, mainly due to the fact that ESCOM could not borrow due to its weak balance sheet. To address this constraint and to accelerate customer connections, ESCOM is proposing to be financed upfront through tariff revenues. ESCOM is committed to ring-fence the revenues for customer connections so that they are solely used for its intended purpose.
3.1.6 Efficiency and Effectiveness.
One stakeholder feedback that we have received, which is also a key principle in service delivery, is ensuring value for money. PML and ESCOM recognize the importance of efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery at all levels of the electricity value chain and that only efficient costs should be passed on to customers. It is also important that ESCOM undertakes revenue enhancement measures in order to improve collection efficiency and that all sector players also adopt cost containment measures. The following measures will be undertaken by ESCOM in the tariff period.
3.1.6.1 Revenue Enhancement Measures
Measure 1: Connection inspections and meter audits
Designed to identify and address illegal connections, tampering of meters and correct application of tariff for the meters.
Measure 2: Installation of feeder metering
- Designed to enhance measurement of losses.
- Currently, end user tariff absorbs 16%, whereas ESCOM is reporting 22.2% losses. The losses that are in excess of MERA-approved 16% translate to MK29.55 billion.
Measure 3: Automatic meter reading and finalize pre-paid technology rollout
- Designed to read meters remotely to ensure meter reading is done on a timely basis and in an accurate manner
- Meter tampering is detected early by software
- Reduce meter reading errors and collusion possibilities.
- Metering problems are detected and acted on immediately
- Complete roll-out of prepaid technology will release the much-needed liquidity – as collection days of 90 days are outside the mandatory 60 days collection period, and 30 days payment period.
Measure 4: Ring-fencing of tariff revenues
- This should facilitate timely identification of variances or deficits when they arise.
- Failure to ring-fence has resulted in commingling of revenues among the licensees.
In general, ESCOM has planned to reduce technical losses in the tariff period from the current 22.2% to 17.4% at a cost of MK20.4 billion.
3.1.6.2 Cost Containment Measures
Measure 1: Procurement Efficiency
- Pursue full implementation of acquisition of inputs from manufacturers, notwithstanding, procurement delays.
- Request For Quotations (RFQs) subjected to an impartial tender adjudication review regardless of amount. This applies to all procurements.
Measure 2: Contracting Out
- To achieve more efficiency in construction of major works for Distribution and Transmission, the Corporation plans to contract out construction of major lines/substations to contractors through Engineering Procurement Construction (EPC) arrangements.
- To achieve the planned 150,000 new connections per year, ESCOM will engage contractors to reinforce its capacity.
- Apart from contracting out of construction and maintenance works, ESCOM will continue to outsource and utilize third parties such as cash collection services, security and cleanings services.
Measure 3: Mechanization and Digitization
ESCOM will mechanize some of its processes such as line construction and maintenance through the use of equipment and tools aimed at enhancing labour productivity and delivery of service.
From the customer service side, ESCOM will introduce initiatives that will allow customers to get some services online such as new applications, complaints management, queries and electricity payments services.
Measure 4: Staff Costs
- To achieve optimal staff compliment, a Human Resource Audit was undertaken, and this is going to be implemented in the tariff period.
- A Functional Review has also been undertaken to determine optimal organizational structures for the licensees.
- Overtime costs to be managed and closely monitored
- ESCOM will review the staff cost ensure that the costs related to maintenance and projects are allocated accordingly.
- Recruitment of additional staff will be done in line with the approved organograms
- With increased mechanization, labour costs are expected to be managed.
3.1.7 Transparency and Accountability.
To ensure compliance with regulatory requirements, tariff revenues for all Licensees will be ring-fenced in the tariff period. This will ensure that Licensees operate in: (i) an effective and efficient manner, (ii) financially sustainable manner, and (iii) a Fair and transparent manner. In accordance with the Tariff Methodology, PML has set up a ring-fenced Bulk Customer Service Transactions Account (The Settlement Account) meant for collection and disbursement of revenues to all licensees.
Additionally, ESCOM has already undertaken the following steps:
- Revenues for each Licensee have been segregated based on tariff Allocation.
- Bank Accounts for Receipting Licensee Revenues have been Operationalized.
- Direct costs of operating the Licensees and Shared Costs from Corporate Office have been identified.
- Chart of Accounts to allow for Licensee reporting have been implemented.
- Ratios for sharing of Corporate Office Costs have been determined.
3.1.8 Network Resilience.
There have been concerns from some of our stakeholders over the resilience of network assets due to the effects of climate change. This has been exemplified by the damage done to generation, transmission and distribution assets in the lower shire due to cyclone Ana. In response, ESCOM will transition from using wood poles to concrete poles in transmission infrastructure which will be designed to withstand effects of climate change. Specifically, ESCOM will invest MK11.93 billion in transmission and distribution infrastructure that has been designed to enhance resilience.
4.0 COST OF DELIVERY ON CUSTOMER AND STAKEHOLDER PRIORITIES
Total cost to deliver on customer and stakeholder priorities over the four years is MK1,650.73 billion. This is comprised of generation purchase costs (MK581.66 billion), single buyer licensee costs (MK167.90 billion), transmission licensee costs (MK112.15 billion), system and market operator licensee costs (MK30.2 billion) and distribution licensee costs (MK758.82 billion).
Figure 1 shows the composition of the individual cost components as a percentage of total costs.
Figure 1: Composition of Revenue Requirements
Below is a summary of the Revenue Requirements for the individual cost components in the electricity value chain.
4.1 Power Purchase Costs
The planned power procurements in the fourth base tariff will be sourced from hydro, thermal and solar. It also recognizes the fact that EGENCO is the largest generator and contributes over 75% of the generation capacity for the country, mainly from its hydro power plants. Therefore, power purchase costs have considered revised tariffs for the EGENCO hydro and thermal power plants. The purchase costs for all the planned energy and capacity are summarized in Table 7 below.
Table 7: Total Purchase Costs
Description | Unit | Base Year | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Total |
Installed Capacity | MW | 537.29 | 558.30 | 608.30 | 608.30 | 608.30 | 2,383.18 |
Energy Generated | GWh | 2,216.30 | 1,922.86 | 2,525.14 | 2,612.74 | 2,612.74 | 9,673.48 |
Energy Purchase Cost | MK Billion | 30.78 | 44.24 | 73.28 | 82.56 | 82.75 | 282.83 |
Capacity Purchase Cost | MK Billion | 58.99 | 69.01 | 69.75 | 71.45 | 72.67 | 282.88 |
Total Purchase Cost | MK Billion | 89.77 | 113.25 | 143.03 | 154.01 | 155.42 | 565.71 |
The total power purchase cost for the power supply sources for the four-year fourth base tariff period is MK565.71 billion. If the wheeling charges for Mozambique-Malawi interconnector amounting to MK15.95 billion are included, the total power purchase costs amount to MK581.66billion.
4.2 Single Buyer Licensee Costs
Power Market Limited (PML) was set up in January 2020, as an independent entity to operationalize the Single Buyer function within the electricity supply chain. PML was granted a Single Buyer License by the Regulator in December 2020. The duties and functions of the Single Buyer are set out in Section 20B of the Electricity (Amendment) Act, as follows:
- prepare long term forecast of demand, taking into consideration the targets of electric supply coverage and expected economic growth in consultation with the Minister;
- undertake least cost long-term generation and transmission plan;
- prepare a ranking of generation projects to be tendered out with the approval of the Minister;
- prepare a ranking of transmission projects to be built, in coordination with transmission licensee, with the approval of the Minister;
- organize, with the approval of the Minister, open tenders for independent power producers that will comply with guidelines established by the Authority;
- evaluate unsolicited proposal from independent power producers and recommend to the Minister for approval;
- negotiate and submit power purchase contracts to the Authority for approval, and sign contracts with independent power producers;
- prepare the annual generation forecast;
- conclude power purchase agreements with generation licensees;
- conclude power supply contracts with distribution licensees; and
- conclude power purchase agreements for importation and exportation of electricity.
4.2.1 Single Buyer Revenue Requirement
The total Single Buyer revenue requirement amounts to MK167.90 billion. Out of this amount, MK26.48 is SB own costs comprising SB assets (MK 4.76 billion), Bank Guarantee charges (MK4.24 billion) and SB operational costs (MK17.47 billion). The balance of MK141.43 billion is capital for Stabilization Fund which is three months’ worth of power purchase costs. The main purpose of this account is to offset the claims by the Licensees and therefore act as guarantee for the supply of the required funds. The Stabilization fund, although part of SB revenue requirement, is meant to cater for all licensees in the sector. The specific revenue requirement for SB operations stands at 2% of the sector revenue requirement (MK26.74 billion).
Table 8 Single Buyer Revenue Requirement
SB Account Costs | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Total |
Electricity Purchased | GWh | 1,923 | 2,525 | 2,613 | 2,613 | 9,673 |
Annual Purchase Cost | MK ‘000 | 113,251,795 | 143,030,513 | 154,008,813 | 155,418,041 | 565,709,163 |
Bank Guarantee Charges | MK ‘000 | 849,388 | 1,072,729 | 1,155,066 | 1,165,635 | 4,242,819 |
Total SB Account Costs | MK ‘000 | 114,101,184 | 144,103,242 | 155,163,879 | 156,583,677 | 569,951,982 |
RAB | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Total |
Stabilization Fund | MK ‘000 | 28,312,949 | 35,757,628 | 38,502,203 | 38,854,510 | 141,427,291 |
SB Assets | MK ‘000 | 3,109,987 | 500,000 | 550,000 | 605,000 | 4,764,987 |
Total RAB | MK ‘000 | 31,422,936 | 36,257,628 | 39,052,203 | 39,459,510 | 146,192,278 |
GENERAL EXPENSES | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Total |
Personnel Expenses | MK ‘000 | 1,253,993 | 1,416,667 | 1,558,334 | 1,714,167 | 5,943,161 |
Operations | MK ‘000 | 1,368,809 | 1,505,690 | 1,656,259 | 1,821,885 | 6,352,643 |
Administration | MK ‘000 | 1,114,587 | 1,226,046 | 1,348,650 | 1,483,515 | 5,172,798 |
Total | 3,737,389 | 4,148,403 | 4,563,243 | 5,019,567 | 17,468,602 | |
REVENUE REQUIREMENT | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Total |
General Expenses | MK ‘000 | 3,737,389 | 4,148,403 | 4,563,243 | 5,019,567 | 17,468,602 |
SB Assets | MK ‘000 | 3,109,987 | 500,000 | 550,000 | 605,000 | 4,764,987 |
Bank Guarantee Charges | MK ‘000 | 849,388 | 1,072,729 | 1,155,066 | 1,165,635 | 4,242,819 |
Total | MK ‘000 | 7,696,764 | 5,721,131 | 6,268,309 | 6,790,202 | 26,476,407 |
Stabilization Fund | MK ‘000 | 28,312,949 | 35,757,628 | 38,502,203 | 38,854,510 | 141,427,291 |
Total SB Costs | MK ‘000 | 36,009,713 | 41,478,760 | 44,770,512 | 45,644,713 | 167,903,698 |
Total | MK ‘000 | 52,507,127 | 58,756,101 | 63,772,889 | 65,276,419 | 236,152,549 |
Energy Billed to Customers | kWh | 1,516,197,723 | 2,023,599,119 | 2,149,733,176 | 2,176,711,284 | 7,866,241,303 |
SB Tariff (SB Operations) | MK/KWh | 5.08 | 2.83 | 2.92 | 3.12 | 3.48 |
SB Tariff (Stabilization Fund) | MK/KWh | 18.67 | 17.67 | 17.91 | 17.85 | 18.03 |
4.3 Transmission Licensee Costs
ESCOM Transmission Business evolves from the Electricity amendment act 2016, whose mandate is to;
- Build, operate and maintain the transmission network in Malawi.
- Undertake transmission planning in collaboration with the Single Buyer licensee.
- Provide information for the Single Buyer licensee’s planning activities.
- Coordinate the operation of the transmission system with the System and Market Operator licensee.
- Comply with the operation procedures and criteria established in the Market Rules and Grid Code for the reliable and economic operation of the transmission system; and
- Coordinate the importation and exportation of electricity as instructed by the Single Buyer Licensee.
4.3.1 Transmission Revenue Requirements
The total Revenue Requirement for the Transmission Licensee is MK112.2 billion composed of MK63 billion OPEX, MK15.7 billion Depreciation, and MK33.4 billion Return on Assets. The table below presents the total Revenue Requirements for the Transmission Licensee in order to discharge its mandate to its stakeholders.
Table 7: Transmission Revenue Requirement
REVENUE REQUIREMENT | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
OPEX | MWK ‘000 | 13,344,180 | 14,776,606 | 16,456,451 | 18,443,794 | 63,021,031 |
Depreciation | MWK ‘000 | 1,618,558 | 2,820,801 | 4,462,300 | 6,826,571 | 15,728,230 |
Return | MWK ‘000 | 3,540,925 | 6,264,432 | 9,767,232 | 13,825,717 | 33,398,306 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 18,503,663 | 23,861,839 | 30,685,984 | 39,096,082 | 112,147,568 |
OPERATING EXPENSES | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
Payroll | MWK ‘000 | 3,958,482 | 4,354,331 | 4,789,764 | 5,268,740 | 18,371,317 |
Services, supplies and sundries | MWK ‘000 | 1,402,509 | 1,558,950 | 1,748,246 | 1,979,517 | 6,689,222 |
Maintenance | MWK ‘000 | 3,858,133 | 4,288,485 | 4,809,214 | 5,445,414 | 18,401,246 |
Operations | MWK ‘000 | 820,495 | 912,017 | 1,022,758 | 1,158,057 | 3,913,327 |
Training expenses | MWK ‘000 | 120,488 | 133,927 | 150,189 | 170,058 | 574,662 |
Share of Head Office Cost | MWK ‘000 | 3,184,072 | 3,528,896 | 3,936,281 | 4,422,007 | 15,071,256 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 13,344,180 | 14,776,606 | 16,456,451 | 18,443,794 | 63,021,031 |
REGULATED ASSET BASE | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
Capex | ||||||
Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 10,925,809 | 10,141,592 | 9,597,637 | 8,984,653 | 8,984,653 |
New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 9,513,131 | 27,086,845 | 49,087,410 | 74,508,577 | 74,508,577 |
Total Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 20,438,940 | 37,228,437 | 58,685,047 | 83,493,229 | 83,493,230 |
DEPRECIATION | ||||||
Existing network Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 897,697 | 784,216 | 655,116 | 612,984 | 2,950,013 |
New network Assets- Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 720,862 | 2,036,585 | 3,807,184 | 6,213,587 | 12,778,218 |
Total – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 1,618,558 | 2,820,801 | 4,462,300 | 6,826,571 | 15,728,230 |
GROSS ASSETS | ||||||
Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 18,722,112 | 18,722,112 | 18,722,112 | 18,722,112 | 18,722,112 |
New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 10,233,993 | 23,399,534 | 35,596,617 | 49,677,537 | 49,677,537 |
Total – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 28,956,105 | 42,121,646 | 54,318,729 | 68,399,649 | 68,399,649 |
HO Share – Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 8,364,839 | 8,364,839 | 8,364,839 | 8,364,839 | 8,364,839 |
HO Share – New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 988,239 | 1,273,914 | 2,949,399 | 7,816,402 | 7,816,402 |
Total – Utility funded (excl HO) | MWK ‘000 | 19,603,027 | 32,482,893 | 43,004,491 | 52,218,408 | 52,218,408 |
WORKING CAPITAL | ||||||
Working Capital | MWK ‘000 | 1,418,620 | 1,440,898 | 1,606,510 | 1,850,704 | 1,850,704 |
RAB | ||||||
Net Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 20,438,940 | 37,228,437 | 58,685,047 | 83,493,229 | 83,493,229 |
Working Capital | MWK ‘000 | 1,418,620 | 1,440,898 | 1,606,510 | 1,850,704 | 1,850,704 |
RAB | MWK ‘000 | 21,857,560 | 38,669,334 | 60,291,557 | 85,343,933 | 85,343,933 |
INVESTMENT COST | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
WACC nominal pre-tax | % | 16.20% | 16.20% | 16.20% | 16.20% | 16.20% |
Depreciation | MWK ‘000 | 1,618,558 | 2,820,801 | 4,462,300 | 6,826,571 | 15,728,230 |
Allowed Return | MWK ‘000 | 3,540,925 | 6,264,432 | 9,767,232 | 13,825,717 | 33,398,306 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 3,540,925 | 6,264,432 | 9,767,232 | 13,825,717 | 33,398,306 |
4.3.2 Operational Expenditure (OPEX)
Apart from building and expanding the system, the Transmission Licensee is also mandated to operate and maintain the transmission network in Malawi. These two mandates are material and labor intensive in nature. As a result, Transmission plans to spend a total of MK13.3 billion, MK14.8 billion, MK16.5 billion, and MK18.4 billion on its operations for financial years 2022 through 2026 respectively.
4.3.3 Depreciation
Depreciation charged on the Regulated Asset Base for the Transmission network is calculated at MK15.7 billion out of which MK2.9 billion is from the Utility Funded Existing Assets, and MK12.8 billion from the Utility Funded New Assets.
4.3.4 Allowed Return
The allowed return has been calculated at MK33.4 billion.
4.4 System Market Operator Licensee
The mandate of System and Market Operator, in line with the Licensing Conditions and obligations, are to manage the Interconnected Power System (IPS) and the Electricity Market of Malawi. The mandate can be broken down into the following obligations-:
- To efficiently discharge the obligations imposed upon it by this licence;
- To facilitate effective competition in the generation, trade and supply of electricity;
- To promote efficiency in the implementation and administration of the Market Rules;
- To efficiently implement and manage the balancing and settlement as provided by the Market Rules;
- To produce plans of expected system operation pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Market Rules;
- To assist the Single Buyer in the preparation of the Year Ahead Plan;
- To produce intra-year system operation planning; and
- To centrally administer a planning process for the long-term operation of reservoirs with storage capacity
4.3.1 Revenue Requirements of SMO
This section contains information regarding required financial resources for the System and Market Operator (SMO). This covers Operational Expenditure, Capital Expenditure and Capital Projects planned for SMO operations in the next four (4) years.
The asset values are input into the Financial Model to determine the revenue requirement for SMO. Previously SMO was allocated small revenue requirement which culminated into the SMO tariff of MK00.62/kWh due to anomaly in accounting SMO Assets. The SMO assets of SCADA and Communications were allocated to Transmission Licensee account instead of that of SMO. In this Business Plan, this anomaly has been corrected; SCADA and Communications have been moved into SMO accounts.
Table 8: System Market Operator Licensee Revenue Requirements
REVENUE REQUIREMENT | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
Opex | MWK ‘000 | 4,396,717 | 4,862,969 | 5,389,137 | 6,001,952 | 20,650,775 |
Depreciation | MWK ‘000 | 569,451 | 758,786 | 1,118,940 | 1,912,102 | 4,359,279 |
Return | MWK ‘000 | 742,680 | 888,674 | 1,311,368 | 2,249,014 | 5,191,737 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 5,708,848 | 6,510,429 | 7,819,446 | 10,163,069 | 30,201,791 |
OPERATING EXPENSES | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
Payroll | MWK ‘000 | 2,009,759 | 2,210,735 | 2,431,808 | 2,674,989 | 9,327,291 |
Services, supplies and sundries | MWK ‘000 | 1,362,594 | 1,514,583 | 1,683,526 | 1,887,948 | 6,448,650 |
Maintenance | MWK ‘000 | 303,218 | 337,040 | 377,965 | 427,965 | 1,446,187 |
Operations | MWK ‘000 | 164,078 | 182,380 | 204,525 | 231,582 | 782,565 |
Training expenses | MWK ‘000 | 257,209 | 285,900 | 320,615 | 363,028 | 1,226,752 |
Share of Head Office Cost | MWK ‘000 | 299,859 | 332,332 | 370,698 | 416,441 | 1,419,330 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 4,396,717 | 4,862,969 | 5,389,137 | 6,001,952 | 20,650,775 |
REGULATED ASSET BASE | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
NET ASSETS | ||||||
Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 3,563,153 | 3,098,203 | 2,655,706 | 2,221,168 | 2,221,168 |
New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 638,371 | 1,965,658 | 4,990,066 | 11,161,474 | 11,161,474 |
Total Assets – Utility Funded | MWK ‘000 | 4,201,524 | 5,063,862 | 7,645,772 | 13,382,642 | 13,382,642 |
DEPRECIATION | ||||||
Existing network Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 478,255 | 464,949 | 442,498 | 434,538 | 1,820,240 |
New network Assets- Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 91,196 | 293,836 | 676,443 | 1,477,564 | 2,539,039 |
Total Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 569,451 | 758,786 | 1,118,940 | 1,912,102 | 4,359,279 |
GROSS ASSETS | ||||||
Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 6,657,264 | 6,657,264 | 6,657,264 | 6,657,264 | 6,657,264 |
New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 729,567 | 1,621,123 | 3,700,850 | 7,648,972 | 7,648,972 |
Total – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 7,386,832 | 8,278,388 | 10,358,115 | 14,306,237 | 14,306,237 |
HO Share – Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 787,756 | 787,756 | 787,756 | 787,756 | 787,756 |
HO Share – New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 93,067 | 119,970 | 277,759 | 736,107 | 736,107 |
Total – Utility funded (excl HO) | MWK ‘000 | 6,506,009 | 7,370,662 | 9,292,601 | 12,782,374 | 12,782,374 |
WORKING CAPITAL | ||||||
Working Capital | MWK ‘000 | 382,923 | 421,777 | 449,095 | 500,163 | 500,163 |
RAB | – | |||||
Net Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 4,201,524 | 5,063,862 | 7,645,772 | 13,382,642 | 13,382,642 |
Working Capital | MWK ‘000 | 382,923 | 421,777 | 449,095 | 500,163 | 500,163 |
RAB | MWK ‘000 | 4,584,447 | 5,485,639 | 8,094,866 | 13,882,805 | 13,882,805 |
INVESTMENT COST | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | |
WACC nominal pre-tax | % | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.2% | |
Depreciation | MWK ‘000 | 569,451 | 758,786 | 1,118,940 | 1,912,102 | 4,359,279 |
Allowed Return | MWK ‘000 | 742,680 | 888,674 | 1,311,368 | 2,249,014 | 5,191,737 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 742,680 | 888,674 | 1,311,368 | 2,249,014 | 5,191,737 |
4.3.2 OPEX Plan
The activities of SMO are predominantly operational and are human capital intensive. Most of the transactions require professional staff as indicated in the previous sections. Therefore, SMO intends to spend about MK2 billion, MK2.2 billion, MK2.4 billion, MK2.6 billion for Payroll for financial years 2022 through 2026.
4.3.3 Depreciation
Depreciation charged on the Regulated Asset Base for the SMO assets and equipment is calculated at MK4.4 billion out of which MK1.8 billion is from the Utility Funded Existing Assets, and MK2.5 billion from the Utility Funded New Assets.
4.3.4 Allowed Return
The total SMO allowed return for the 2022-26 Base Tariff period has been calculated at MK5.2 billion.
4.4 Distribution Licensee Costs
The Distribution Licensee (DL) was formed by an Act of Parliament of the Republic of Malawi under (Section 20 [2] of the Electricity (Amendment) Act 2016. The DL has a legal mandate to perform the following duties and functions:
- Plan, build operate and maintain the distribution network in Malawi.
- Supply electricity to consumers.
- Take meter readings, prepare and deliver invoices, and collect payments from consumers.
- Provide information to the Single Buyer licensee for planning and forecasts purposes.
- Coordinate the operation of the distribution system with the System and Market Operator licensee.
- Forecast the electricity consumption in each node or zone supplied by the licensee at every time segment of the day; and
- Provide information to the System and Market Operator licensee for the daily generation dispatch.
Besides the tasks of planning, constructing, operating, maintaining Distribution network and provision of customer services functions, the Licensee is also responsible for implementation of some key activities within its area of operations such as prepayment metering, retailing, customer services and demand side management.
Table 9: Distribution Revenue Requirements | ||||||
REVENUE REQUIREMENT | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
Opex | MWK ‘000 | 77,729,958 | 84,923,451 | 93,325,921 | 103,224,340 | 359,203,669 |
Depreciation | MWK ‘000 | 8,471,270 | 18,067,674 | 33,833,406 | 56,069,184 | 116,441,534 |
Return | MWK ‘000 | 25,332,392 | 48,458,378 | 82,460,055 | 126,920,955 | 283,171,779 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 111,533,620 | 151,449,503 | 209,619,381 | 286,214,478 | 758,816,983 |
OPERATING EXPENSES | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
Payroll | MWK ‘000 | 24,445,674 | 26,890,241 | 29,579,265 | 32,537,192 | 113,452,373 |
Services, supplies and sundries | MWK ‘000 | 10,119,919 | 11,248,736 | 12,614,611 | 14,283,372 | 48,266,637 |
Maintenance | MWK ‘000 | 13,142,911 | 14,608,924 | 16,382,810 | 18,550,058 | 62,684,704 |
Operations | MWK ‘000 | 4,502,651 | 5,004,895 | 5,612,614 | 6,355,095 | 21,475,255 |
Service Drops (Incl free connections) | MWK ‘000 | 10,401,377 | 10,401,377 | 10,401,377 | 10,401,377 | 41,605,508 |
Training expenses | MWK ‘000 | 4,522,985 | 5,027,497 | 5,637,960 | 6,383,794 | 21,572,236 |
Share of Head Office Cost | MWK ‘000 | 10,594,441 | 11,741,781 | 13,097,283 | 14,713,453 | 50,146,957 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 77,729,958 | 84,923,451 | 93,325,921 | 103,224,340 | 359,203,669 |
REGULATED ASSET BASE | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
NET ASSETS | ||||||
Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 58,426,694 | 55,055,380 | 52,108,992 | 49,127,207 | 49,127,207 |
New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 62,783,584 | 197,222,250 | 404,746,247 | 677,718,226 | 677,718,226 |
Total Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 121,210,278 | 252,277,631 | 456,855,239 | 726,845,433 | 726,845,433 |
DEPRECIATION | ||||||
Existing network Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 3,930,381 | 3,553,422 | 3,128,496 | 2,981,785 | 13,594,084 |
New network Assets- Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 4,540,889 | 14,514,252 | 30,704,909 | 53,087,399 | 102,847,450 |
Total Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 8,471,270 | 18,067,674 | 33,833,406 | 56,069,184 | 116,441,534 |
GROSS ASSETS | ||||||
Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 88,765,253 | 88,765,253 | 88,765,253 | 88,765,253 | 88,765,253 |
New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 67,324,473 | 148,952,919 | 238,228,906 | 326,059,377 | 326,059,377 |
Total Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 156,089,726 | 237,718,172 | 326,994,159 | 414,824,630 | 414,824,630 |
HO Share – Existing Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 27,832,532 | 27,832,532 | 27,832,532 | 27,832,532 | 27,832,532 |
HO Share – New Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 3,288,193 | 7,526,919 | 17,340,526 | 43,348,233 | 43,348,233 |
Total Utility funded (excl HO) | MWK ‘000 | 124,969,001 | 202,358,722 | 281,821,101 | 343,643,866 | 343,643,866 |
WORKING CAPITAL | ||||||
Working Capital | MWK ‘000 | 35,162,511 | 46,848,159 | 52,157,444 | 56,617,251 | 56,617,251 |
RAB | – | |||||
Net Assets – Utility funded | MWK ‘000 | 121,210,278 | 252,277,631 | 456,855,239 | 726,845,433 | 726,845,433 |
Working Capital | MWK ‘000 | 35,162,511 | 46,848,159 | 52,157,444 | 56,617,251 | 56,617,251 |
RAB | MWK ‘000 | 156,372,788 | 299,125,790 | 509,012,683 | 783,462,684 | 783,462,684 |
INVESTMENT COST | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | TOTAL |
WACC nominal pre-tax | % | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.2% | 16.2% |
Depreciation | MWK ‘000 | 8,471,270 | 18,067,674 | 33,833,406 | 56,069,184 | 116,441,534 |
Allowed Return | MWK ‘000 | 25,332,392 | 48,458,378 | 82,460,055 | 126,920,955 | 283,171,779 |
Total | MWK ‘000 | 25,332,392 | 48,458,378 | 82,460,055 | 126,920,955 | 283,171,779 |
4.4.1 Distribution Revenue Requirements
The total Revenue Requirement for the Distribution Licensee is MK758.8 billion composed of MK359 billion OPEX, MK116.4 billion Depreciation and MK283.2 billion Return on Asset.
The table below presents the total Revenue Requirements for the Distribution Licensee in order to discharge its mandate to its stakeholders.
4.4.2 OPEX Plan
Apart from building and expanding the Distribution system, the Licensee is also mandated to operate and maintain the Distribution network in Malawi. These mandates are material and labor intensive in nature. As a result, Distribution plans to spend a total of MK77.7 billion, MK84.9 billion, MK93.3 billion, and MK103.2 billion on its operations within the 2022-26 Base Tariff period respectively
4.4.3 Depreciation
Depreciation charged on the Regulated Asset Base for Distribution Licensee network assets and equipment is calculated at MK116.4 billion out of which MK13.6 billion is from the Utility Funded Existing Assets and MK102.9 billion from the Utility Funded New Assets.
4.4.4 Allowed Return
The total Distribution Licensee allowed return for the 2022-26 Base Tariff period has been calculated at MK283.2 billion.
4.5. DISTRIBUTION TARIFF
There is a significant increase in the distribution tariff from the third base tariff period due to the need to ensure improved customer service, sustainability of the power sector and acceleration of electricity access, among others. The average tariff is therefore MK94.35/kWh.
DISTRIBUTION TARIFF | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Total |
Distribution Own Costs | MK ‘000 | 111,533,620 | 151,449,503 | 209,619,381 | 286,214,478 | 758,816,982 |
Energy Billed to Customers | kWh | 1,516,197,723 | 2,023,599,119 | 2,149,733,176 | 2,176,711,284 | 7,866,241,303 |
Distribution Tariff | MK/kWh | 73.56 | 74.84 | 97.51 | 131.49 | 94.35 |
6.0 BULK TARIFF
The bulk tariff revenue requirement comprises power purchase costs and revenue requirements for all licensees excluding the Distribution licensee. The average bulk tariff is MK113.37/kWh.
BULK TARIFF | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Total |
Purchased energy from power plants | MK ‘000 | 44,242,675 | 73,277,827 | 82,562,823 | 82,750,733 | 282,834,058 |
Purchased capacity from power plants | MK ‘000 | 69,009,120 | 69,752,686 | 71,445,991 | 72,667,309 | 282,875,106 |
Wheeling charges | MK ‘000 | 4,350,816 | 5,801,088 | 5,801,088 | 15,952,991 | |
Transmission Own Cost | MK ‘000 | 18,503,663 | 23,861,839 | 30,685,984 | 39,096,082 | 112,147,568 |
SMO Own cost | MK ‘000 | 5,708,848 | 6,510,429 | 7,819,446 | 10,163,069 | 30,201,792 |
SB Own cost | MK ‘000 | 7,696,764 | 5,721,131 | 6,268,309 | 6,790,202 | 26,476,407 |
Escrow/Stabilization Costs | MK ‘000 | 28,312,949 | 35,757,628 | 38,502,203 | 38,854,510 | 141,427,291 |
Total Bulk Cost | MK ‘000 | 173,474,019 | 219,232,357 | 243,085,843 | 256,122,993 | 891,915,212 |
Energy Billed to Customers | kWh | 1,516,197,723 | 2,023,599,119 | 2,149,733,176 | 2,176,711,284 | 7,866,241,303 |
Bulk Tariff | MK/kWh | 114.41 | 108.34 | 113.08 | 117.67 | 113.37 |
7.0 SUMMARY OF TARIFF COMPONENTS
Component | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Average | Percentage |
Power Purchase Cost | MK/kWh | 74.69 | 70.68 | 71.64 | 71.40 | 72.10 | 35% |
Wheeling charges Tariff | MK/kWh | – | 2.15 | 2.70 | 2.67 | 1.88 | 1% |
Transmission Tariff | MK/kWh | 12.20 | 11.79 | 14.27 | 17.96 | 14.06 | 7% |
SMO Tariff | MK/kWh | 3.77 | 3.22 | 3.64 | 4.67 | 3.82 | 2% |
SB Tariff | MK/kWh | 5.08 | 2.83 | 2.92 | 3.12 | 3.48 | 2% |
Stabilization Fund Tariff | MK/kWh | 18.67 | 17.67 | 17.91 | 17.85 | 18.03 | 9% |
Distribution Tariff | MK/kWh | 73.56 | 74.84 | 97.51 | 131.49 | 94.35 | 45% |
Total End User Tariff | MK/kWh | 187.98 | 183.18 | 210.59 | 249.15 | 207.72 |
8.0 END USER TARIFF
The average end user tariff for the base tariff period has increase to MK207.72/kWh from an average of MK104.46/kWh in the third base tariff period. This represents an increase of 99%. This increase is mainly due to EGENCO power plant tariffs which have been revised to ensure cost reflectivity of the tariff; Inclusion of the Stabilization Fund and efforts to improve service delivery to customers by the Distribution Licensee. Additionally, the devaluation of the kwacha has contributed to the significant increase in power purchase costs.
END USER TARIFF | Unit | 2022/23 | 2023/24 | 2024/25 | 2025/26 | Average |
Bulk Tariff | MK /kWh | 114.41 | 108.34 | 113.08 | 117.67 | 113.37 |
Distribution Tariff | MK /kWh | 73.56 | 74.84 | 97.51 | 131.49 | 94.35 |
End User Tariff | MK /kWh | 187.98 | 183.18 | 210.59 | 249.15 | 207.72 |
7.0 SUBMISSION
The proposed Revenue Requirement is based on cost recovery principles to allow the licensees to recover cost of service including a reasonable return on capital, encourage efficiency in the delivery of service to customers and improve financial sustainability. Licensee revenue requirements have been separately identified as per the requirements of the 2017 Tariff Methodology.
Submitted for your consideration and approval.